Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100]

Author Topic: The Movie Discussion Thread!  (Read 202102 times)

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1485 on: June 21, 2025, 12:42:05 pm »

I remember wanting to see that, but couldn't find it anywhere in theatres or streaming back then. Where did you watch it on?
Logged

Frumple

  • Bay Watcher
  • The Prettiest Kyuuki
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1486 on: June 21, 2025, 01:01:11 pm »

Quick check seems to be saying it's a prime thing, so amazon? Maybe apple tv, but it seems to be an amazon thing first and foremost, so far as legal streaming goes.
Logged
Ask not!
What your country can hump for you.
Ask!
What you can hump for your country.

Jopax

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cat on a hat
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1487 on: June 21, 2025, 01:01:42 pm »

I believe Amazon are the ones that handled distribution as it never had a wide release in theaters (coming in early after covid and all).

As I'm kinda done with any and all streaming bullshit I just yo-ho-hoed my way to a copy :V
Logged
"my batteries are low and it's getting dark"
AS - IG

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1488 on: June 21, 2025, 03:14:41 pm »

Bleugh. I don't do Amazon. Oh, well.
Logged

Folly

  • Bay Watcher
  • Steam Profile: 76561197996956175
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1489 on: July 05, 2025, 12:51:39 am »

I just finished watching Marvel's Thunderbolts.

It's Marvel, so of course the moment-to-moment action and dialogue were of sufficient quality to keep me entertained. However, any time I actually bothered to think for a second about the story being told, it was pretty awful.

In particular I hated the villain. His entire backstory was that some emo kid got a back-alley injection of supersoldier serum which inexplicably gave him a suite of powers both stronger and less plausible than Superman. I hate the unassisted flight, I hate his sudden mastery of combat reflexes with zero training, I hate the instant mastery of all his powers with no practice, and I hate the fact that he survived his 'Kill-Switch' with no explanation. At an absolute minimum this guy should have had a montage or time-skip, coupled with some nonsense pseudoscience blabber to explain what he can do. But none of that was provided, he is just an instant perfect villain essentially spawned from the ether because of lazy writing I guess.
Then a haphazardly assembled group of self-serving assholes who had known this emo kid for a matter of hours decided to dive into what appeared to be certain death just so they could save him with the power of friendship. None of that tracks, at all.

Marvel's writing has been trending downwards for years now, and it appears to still be moving in the wrong direction.
Logged

Jopax

  • Bay Watcher
  • Cat on a hat
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1490 on: July 16, 2025, 07:53:37 am »

Went and saw the new Superman movie. Wasn't particularly excited to due to DC being a mess for the past decade and general superhero fatigue kicking in a while ago, but hey it was a night out with friends so why not.

Turns out it's pretty good? It's a weird one tho, a bit clunky and messy in places but overall a fun and enjoyable ride while it lasts. Plus it's like an anti-snyder movie in terms of tone so that gives it so much bonus points if you're not into dark and dour superman. Bunch of fun cameos in it as well, from the whole Justice Gang to the little showings of folks like Peacemaker and others.

I just hope it stays a fun little move and doesn't get milked to death like every other successful thing these days seems to be.
Logged
"my batteries are low and it's getting dark"
AS - IG

Folly

  • Bay Watcher
  • Steam Profile: 76561197996956175
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1491 on: July 16, 2025, 10:48:57 am »

I just hope it stays a fun little move and doesn't get milked to death like every other successful thing these days seems to be.

https://dcuniverse.fandom.com/wiki/DC_Universe
Logged

Il Palazzo

  • Bay Watcher
  • And lo, the Dude did abide. And it was good.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1492 on: August 07, 2025, 09:58:48 pm »

Finally watched Tenet. That's some super impressive timey-wimey stuff. Primer-grade brain buster, but with big bucks action choreography.
Too bad the entire rest of it, including character drama, is so botched. I understand it's supposed to be generic, the protagonist is called the Protagonist after all. It's almost like a tech demo stretched over a slapdash skeleton. And, to its credit, most of the time the plot is serviceable enough to let you appreciate the technical aspects. But every now and then somebody says something off-colour, or you stop and think about the motivations or implications, and it takes you out of the experience.
Logged

lemon10

  • Bay Watcher
  • Citrus Master
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1493 on: August 18, 2025, 10:06:24 am »

Just watched the new Superman movie, and everyone was 100% right, Luthor truly is a once in a millennia hater.
He just hates Superman *so* *so* much its amazing.
I got to the monkey scene and just cracked up.

The movie was way better then the last batch of Superman stuff. It wasn't dark and hard to see everything, morally he felt like superman, his superhero bros felt better then the last batch, ect.
« Last Edit: August 18, 2025, 10:21:51 am by lemon10 »
Logged
And with a mighty leap, the evil Conservative flies through the window, escaping our heroes once again!
Because the solution to not being able to control your dakka is MOAR DAKKA.

That's it. We've finally crossed over and become the nation of Da Orky Boyz.

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1494 on: August 25, 2025, 05:28:07 pm »

Forgot to say, earlier, I've now seen the first film, in a while, actually on the Big Screen... And it's one that most people will only see on Netflix (or beyond), as it had a limited Cinema release, in the UK, one venue just happening to be quite near where me and someone else happened to be with a couple of hours in hand... (So, yes, you can probably assume I was near one of no more than thirty possible locations over the weekend. But bear in mind that there was also a lot of driving involved, for other purposes!)

The Thursday Murder Club - original book(s) by Richard Osman, adapted to full-screen with the help of some newcomer to the business called... Steven Spielberg. I wish him well in all future endeavours! And some lesser known actors with names such as Brosnan, Mirren, etc, who may have great careers in front of them if they play their cards right.

Of particular note, to fans of Doctor Who, you've got a real treat, with Ingrid Oliver, who played the Osgoods, human and otherwise! Of course, you thought I was going to mention someone who actually played two different Doctors! Well, he's in this too. And also another guy. David... Renting? Leaseholder? Something like that... it'll come to me later.


Have you read the book(s)? Then you know it's (in some ways) a 'cosy crime procedural', by plot, British through and through, and you'll be interested to see how well it got adapted. I think you'll find it on the positive side of that particular swingometer, from both my own assessment and overheard discussions between those who also saw my particular screening. Not all positive, but definitely net-positive.

For those who haven't experienced the source material, bear this "cosy" bit in mind (and Britishness, though shall we say a notch or two down from Downton Abbey?) as there's not much in the way of fast cars and flashing blue lights (though there is some, including from one of the main cast, but of course yet another one drives... shall we say... sedately?). And it has to set up the story components and characters in a way that a bit of author's-eye-view (and even writing directly inside the minds of characters) can do a lot subtler. It still keeps it low impact, mostly, so be prepared for a little plodding through. And watch out for someone being told what "C.I.D." stands for, in an actual policing context, was clearly there for the international audience (in leiu of renaming them the Murder Squad or Homocide Unit, which it could quite easily have been in different screenplay hands).


Faithfulness to the source material was quite good. Haven't reread it recently (not since just after learning it was "on the cards"), and not going to have chance to dive back in for maybe another week, but it hit the general plotline well. One possibly major change, that could effect any sequel movies, but too spoilery to really discuss (plus I need to check the book, anyway, on what it changed from, exactly). Some other rejiggles, I suspect for the sake of a better film, but Osman knows the small-screen business well, so I suspect that the core prose was written not far from what Netflix and the screenplay-writers would be happy to follow (except for the Joycian Asides, of course).


I'm sure a readthrough, this viewing being fresh in my mind, will reveal a few more things. But none of the ones I did see seemed to be a problem. If you watch this (Netflix/beyond, when you'll probably have the leisure to effectively pause, rewind and entirely rewatch, anyway) probably best to consider this a relaxing whodunnit, a few on-screen moments of action and urgency aside. Or watch it for the All-Star Cast and "didn't I see him/her in..?" moments. Perhaps more so from a British perspective, as (the genuine and certified Hollwood Luvvies aside) some are probably more locally-appreciated "character" faces.

(I mean, Celia Imrie may have been in a Star Wars film, Highlander and was a Who villain, but I probably think of her most either as the reader of the early Witches novels, for the Discworld audio books, or for her Acorn Antiques/Dinnerladies collaboration with Victoria Wood. Anyway, I think she does her character justice in this film too.)
« Last Edit: August 25, 2025, 05:34:41 pm by Starver »
Logged

McTraveller

  • Bay Watcher
  • For those who come after.
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1495 on: August 30, 2025, 11:37:43 pm »

Hahaha Thunderbolts* is hilarious.
Logged
This product contains deoxyribonucleic acid which is known to the State of California to cause cancer, reproductive harm, and other health issues.

Great Order

  • Bay Watcher
  • [SCREAMS_INTERNALLY]
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1496 on: November 14, 2025, 01:00:56 pm »

Rewatched World War Z for the first time since 2014 or something and I have to say, it's a lot worse than I remember.

I remember it as a not particularly notable zombie film. Fun enough to have on in the background.

Upon a rewatch it felt pretty inconsistent. It didn't really feel like it had much of an overarching plot so much as an excuse to send someone to various locations. The acting felt pretty meh too. Not outright bad, but not good. Also the blatant Pepsi product placement was unintentionally hilarious, and the zombies clacking their teeth like beavers gnawing at a tree was comical. The whole Israel segment was comical too. They walled off a colossal area in a week, and that unrealistic building time turned out to be fucking useless because they handed someone a microphone to sing on.

And the virologist offing himself by slipping and shooting his own head. Could you imagine explaining that to the actor? "Yeah you come in, do a little bit of exposition, panic and blow your own brains out by falling over. Your total screen time is about two minutes, enjoy!"

Probably the only good bit is when Gerry gets a phone call and alerts a horde by accident, and one of the rangers quips about keeping all pagers and cell phones off for everyone else's convenience.
Logged
Quote
I may have wasted all those years
They're not worth their time in tears
I may have spent too long in darkness
In the warmth of my fears

Starver

  • Bay Watcher
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1497 on: November 14, 2025, 02:23:38 pm »

Been a while since my one complete watch of it, so I might misremember how completely it was, but I do recall it to be a "Character-driven plot", indeed. The protagonist basically being(/going) pretty much wherever in the world the the next key scene is going to happen (either getting there in time for something key to happen to him, or ending up where something key has just already started to happen.... or both, due to Law Of Significance).

Telgin

  • Bay Watcher
  • Professional Programmer
    • View Profile
Re: The Movie Discussion Thread!
« Reply #1498 on: November 14, 2025, 08:01:56 pm »

I saw Predator: Badlands yesterday.  It's a bit of a weird movie, but I liked it overall.  I wasn't expecting a lot out of it, but it was worth watching.

Definitely didn't feel like a Predator movie, and I have mixed feelings on a predator talking, subtitles or not, but it was watchable.

Most of my gripes are with the Weyland-Yutani stuff in the movie, which is unsurprising since I'm much more of an Alien fan than Predator, and thus much pickier about the material borrowed from it.

Spoiler (click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: November 14, 2025, 08:16:56 pm by Telgin »
Logged
Through pain, I find wisdom.
Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100]