Bay 12 Games Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

Author Topic: my manager is a lazy bum - or why I don't want to assign labours any more  (Read 883 times)

fbk

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile

Dear all,

when 0.42.06 came out, I started playing vanilla DF again, ie. I played without dwarf therapist. I immediately fell back to my old and awful habit of simply enabling all labours for everyone when I needed a job done. I've always done it this way, and it annoys the living hell out of me.

Today, it occurred to me that this should not be my job: I should have a noble take care of it!

It could be the manager, or a new noble, eg. a foreman.

All he has to do is inspect jobs that are pending for too long, and make sure that some dwarf has the right labour setting.
The algorithm does not need to be very good: I fully expect the guy to mess things up.

For me, this would completely remove the need for dwarf therapist, and it's the one single feature I desperately wish for.

Cheers!
A seasoned player















Logged

90908

  • Bay Watcher
  • Heresy will not be tolerated
    • View Profile
Re: my manager is a lazy bum - or why I don't want to assign labours any more
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2016, 06:23:11 pm »

Dear all,

when 0.42.06 came out, I started playing vanilla DF again, ie. I played without dwarf therapist. I immediately fell back to my old and awful habit of simply enabling all labours for everyone when I needed a job done. I've always done it this way, and it annoys the living hell out of me.

Today, it occurred to me that this should not be my job: I should have a noble take care of it!

It could be the manager, or a new noble, eg. a foreman.

All he has to do is inspect jobs that are pending for too long, and make sure that some dwarf has the right labour setting.
The algorithm does not need to be very good: I fully expect the guy to mess things up.

For me, this would completely remove the need for dwarf therapist, and it's the one single feature I desperately wish for.

Cheers!
A seasoned player

I agree with this wholeheartedly, but I imagine a system where you could stop the noble from enabling certain jobs would be nice. Also, would the labor be removed afterward, or would it be permanent?
Logged
We have a rich tradition of percussion instruments as well, all of which are based around a musician smacking variously sized hollow rocks.
It was quite brutal actually. Who knew you could suffer major head trauma from undergarments?

SixOfSpades

  • Bay Watcher
  • likes flesh balls for their calming roundness
    • View Profile
Re: my manager is a lazy bum - or why I don't want to assign labours any more
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2016, 01:58:06 am »

It could be the manager, or a new noble, eg. a foreman.

All he has to do is inspect jobs that are pending for too long, and make sure that some dwarf has the right labour setting.
I've considered the possibility of the Manager, Broker, and Bookkeeper all having the ability to nominate assistants, whose appointments would be confirmed by the mayor/player.

Assistant brokers would fulfill the obvious function of standing in for their boss & his notoriously inconvenient sense of timing. (Granted, "Anyone can trade" already does this, but who wants to see their gem-encrusted gold goblets sold off by a 14-year-old Lye Maker?) In the rare event that the broker actually does make it to the Depot in time, his assistant will still try to be there as well, for the Appraiser training that comes from watching her master haggle.
Assistant bookkeepers would do the legwork required to make meticulous record-keeping actually realistic. Instead of your bookkeeper mysteriously gaining real-time infinite clairvoyance simply because you kept her locked in her room playing Sudoku for a couple of months, the bookkeeping screen (i.e., you) doesn't know about that just-mined lump of orthoclase until it gets dumped in a stockpile, one of the assistants arrives to assess said stockpile, and then he returns to the office to report his findings to the bookkeeper, who adjusts the great ledger accordingly.
Assistant managers would similarly roam the fort, notifying workers of new jobs and yelling at the ones that seem too lazy. Helpfully, they can combine these duties with related hauling--if they have to go down to the smelters & tell them that boss wants 20 bronze bars, they can make a quick stop at the woodpile and drop off some charcoal needed for the very job that they're announcing. Also, it might be interesting/useful if the work orders gained persistence proportional to the number of assistants: That is, a managerial order will not be cancelled until all of the assistant managers report its failure.
Logged
Dwarf Fortress -- kind of like Minecraft, but for people who hate themselves.

fbk

  • Escaped Lunatic
    • View Profile
Re: my manager is a lazy bum - or why I don't want to assign labours any more
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2016, 08:13:57 am »

Also, would the labor be removed afterward, or would it be permanent?

Good question!

I think he should: The foreman's job (if I may call him that) should be to balance the workload across the total population.

t could work by making sure that all labours are enabled, possibly per burrow. This would be enough to make the game fully playable without external tools again.
Later, his tasks could become more elaborate, like maybe identify lazy dwarves who did not do anything in the past season, and assign them to the most frequent jobs.

Logged