Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[ToonyMan]

It will be very funny if we counterwagon our way back to it just being Agent vs Toony again

It's been really dramatic, like a rollercoaster made out of giant rubberbands.

I think AnimePigeon went to bed. So AP and Agentt's votes aren't going to move before deadline.

[notquitethere]

Very dramatic! It's getting late here (12.38am) and it is past my bedtime, but I will probably stay up and see what happens now.

Agentt: 3: Crystalizedmire, notquitethere, Imp
Magma Mater: 2: Jim Groovester, ToonyMan
Salvatore Monday: 1: AnimePigeon,
ToonyMan: 3: Agentt, Magma Mater, Salvatore Monday

[Jim Groovester]

I'm okay with Magma Mater and I'm okay with Agentt. Not really okay with ToonyMan.

Trying to debate with myself who between Agentt and Magma Mater would be more informative. If I get Magma Mater I think I learn about ToonyMan and maybe about CrystalizedMire as well. I'm not sure what I learn if it's Agentt.

ToonyMan

Force my hand, why don't you.

Agentt.

[Magma Mater]

Toony has been playing fine. Well maybe not fine-fine, but D1-fine. Agent's vote on him is bad but makes sense, it was just to save his skin when he went to bed. But Magma? I don't get it.

Magma, give me the elevator pitch for why we should pitch Toony down an elevator shaft.

Really it boils down to two things. ToonyMan has posted a lot but hasn't done much, so the points I can make are limited.

1. Pushed Crystalizedmire and Agentt for playing the same as the previous game. This is fine for a start-of-game read, but ToonyMan has pushed it throughout the day. He also wasn't the first to come up with the idea - Jim Groovester posted it first, and ToonyMan ran with it. In my view, this is scummy because ToonyMan knows that the idea already has traction with at least one person, so it's safe and will allow him to fabricate a "mind-meld" with another player.

2. Started pushing me hard after I voted for him, and especially once it became clear that he'd be a consideration for the day's lynch. Around halfway through the day, I think ToonyMan went into damage-control mode where he just started accusing the people voting for him, and avoided giving negative opinions on anyone else. If ToonyMan is mafia, this is a way for him to avoid giving out too much information. If he's town... I don't see how he would think that the game would be that simple. His push onto me has been entirely reactive, and based on things I've said about him while avoiding the things I've said about other people.

[ToonyMan]

Agentt then I'm still fine with that.

[Magma Mater]

Agentt then I'm still fine with that.

How does Crystalizedmire's vote on Agentt fit into your worldview?

[ToonyMan]

1. Pushed Crystalizedmire and Agentt for playing the same as the previous game. This is fine for a start-of-game read, but ToonyMan has pushed it throughout the day. He also wasn't the first to come up with the idea - Jim Groovester posted it first, and ToonyMan ran with it. In my view, this is scummy because ToonyMan knows that the idea already has traction with at least one person, so it's safe and will allow him to fabricate a "mind-meld" with another player.

That's not fair. I had the same thought as Jim, I didn't copy Jim.

[Salvatore Monday]

Hmm. I'm not so sure it's Agentt, but it'll be interesting if it is.

I'd switch back to Magma if there's enough traction for a plurality.

[Imp]

Toony has been playing fine. Well maybe not fine-fine, but D1-fine. Agent's vote on him is bad but makes sense, it was just to save his skin when he went to bed. But Magma? I don't get it.

Magma, give me the elevator pitch for why we should pitch Toony down an elevator shaft.

Really it boils down to two things. ToonyMan has posted a lot but hasn't done much, so the points I can make are limited.

1. Pushed Crystalizedmire and Agentt for playing the same as the previous game. This is fine for a start-of-game read, but ToonyMan has pushed it throughout the day. He also wasn't the first to come up with the idea - Jim Groovester posted it first, and ToonyMan ran with it. In my view, this is scummy because ToonyMan knows that the idea already has traction with at least one person, so it's safe and will allow him to fabricate a "mind-meld" with another player.

2. Started pushing me hard after I voted for him, and especially once it became clear that he'd be a consideration for the day's lynch. Around halfway through the day, I think ToonyMan went into damage-control mode where he just started accusing the people voting for him, and avoided giving negative opinions on anyone else. If ToonyMan is mafia, this is a way for him to avoid giving out too much information. If he's town... I don't see how he would think that the game would be that simple. His push onto me has been entirely reactive, and based on things I've said about him while avoiding the things I've said about other people.

I have returned from family stuffs.

Reading now.

[notquitethere]

Thought ultimately we got back to where we started the journey should be very educational after we've had some flips...

If the dopps are just Agent and Magma I honestly feel bad for them. Hopefully the game is a little more complex than that.

[ToonyMan]

Agentt then I'm still fine with that.

How does Crystalizedmire's vote on Agentt fit into your worldview?

I don't know I guess it makes Agentt/Crystal less likely here.

[Imp]

Hmm. I'm not so sure it's Agentt, but it'll be interesting if it is.

I'd switch back to Magma if there's enough traction for a plurality.

You had said you didn't want Toons dead today?  Just preference but considerable sus, the funny of tie vote again, see what we all do... what?

[Imp]

1. Pushed Crystalizedmire and Agentt for playing the same as the previous game. This is fine for a start-of-game read, but ToonyMan has pushed it throughout the day. He also wasn't the first to come up with the idea - Jim Groovester posted it first, and ToonyMan ran with it. In my view, this is scummy because ToonyMan knows that the idea already has traction with at least one person, so it's safe and will allow him to fabricate a "mind-meld" with another player.

That's not fair. I had the same thought as Jim, I didn't copy Jim.

What's fair got to do with a read based on one person speaking, another not?

Or what else is unfair?

Evil Imp wants to know about unfairness.  Grrr

[Salvatore Monday]

Hmm. I'm not so sure it's Agentt, but it'll be interesting if it is.

I'd switch back to Magma if there's enough traction for a plurality.

You had said you didn't want Toons dead today?  Just preference but considerable sus, the funny of tie vote again, see what we all do... what?

I didn't say I don't want him dead, just that I want to believe he's good.

[Jim Groovester]

I'd switch back to Magma if there's enough traction for a plurality.

I would bite but outside of you, me, and ToonyMan I don't think there's a fourth Magma Mater voter to be found.