TDS: YOu're like a KINGMAKER here (forgot the term, is like 'king' when they're in control of hammer)--how do you best plan to use it, and are you favorably equal in seeing everyone's potential of speaking and the quality they hold?
I'm not quite sure what you're asking, but I'm not too inherently biased against anyone here. I've already detailed my general strategy for controlling the vote.
Wait.
TDS: Why do you have the vote? What possessed you to want voting to work that way?
I submitted a Shakeragian role intended to give me the only vote because I thought it would be funny and to see what Fallacy would do with it. It almost worked, except everyone else has to confirm my choice too 
.
Also, no, I'm not going to put myself up for lynching no matter how many votes I get.
...Curious.
You submitted a Shakeragian role, with an intent. There is no way someone can submit a role with an intent as it declarifies the game and pretty much makes bias out of the GM, who would be impartial.
? Role name choice definitely has an impact on what kind of role people get. The GM still has final say of course, but our role name submissions are his inspiration for roles. (Sidenote: I was really hoping for a role that gave me complete control over the lynch without anyone else knowing it, but Fallacy was not amused and gave me a weaker role).
Because my role necessitate more information in order to create more information.
What kind of information would you like?
Because I have many fine pieces of information, readily available to those who ask.
Can I have a random piece of fine information (related to this game, of course)?
Author
Topic: Fallacy's BYOR 2: Game over! Post-game write up up. (Read 92376 times)