...I'm the only remaining cult, as I said. I've given up on bluffing, as my scumpicks couldn't be stated properly without giving up on the whole "there are multiple cultists" lie.
Jack: Could you possibly elaborate on your suspicions? They seem to be "yeah, this guy's scum because of some stuff, this guy is probably his partner for stuff relating to that other stuff, and the third is probably this guy because...yeah...".
I'm also interested about whether or not your suspicions of me are more through process of elimination or evidence against me.
On you: Process of elimination. You're my weakest pick. I don't really have much evidence against you together. You're just there because Jokerman's vote was one that could've been very problematic for the mafia, if I had actually finished on Ottofar. I need to gather more evidence when it comes to you and Jokerman.
As I said, these picks were basically what I could scavenge together from my notes in cultchat, what I remembered, and a glance through day 4. I was not expecting there to be such a giant gap between days.
Ottofar has generally lurked, OMGUSed, contributed almost nothing, repeatedly promised to give content that he never gave (day 2...), refused repeatedly to give reasoning for his votes, and only got out of being lynched for scummy actions day 2 because he promised to take an action. He really was a zombie, but still. Overwhelming general scumminess makes Ottofar the most likely mafia member, in my eyes.
Leafsnail tried hard to prevent an Ottofar lynch, via what now looks very much like a chainsaw defense to me, and was one of the two people spearheading the IronyOwl mislynch. He was also slow to actually bother voting for Irony, spending a while just bashing Irony without bothering to change his vote, but that might just have been a mistake.
Author
Topic: Why Would You Do That?: A Mafia Misadventure: Game Over, nobody wins >:I (Read 179693 times)