So, you're saying that right out of the box you have the highest possible intelligence score possible?
interesting
Some buddies of mine, we all would sometimes play table top RPG's with "ourselves" in the game. So we'd stat ourselves out based on the system and then play. We found that this just leads to lots of eye rolling.
"Oh, you have THAT score? Are you serious?"
"No offense dude but you're not NEARLY as charming as you think you are"
"How the hell can you have above average strength when you can't even bench the bar!"
So what we started to do is have everyone stat everyone else and do averages. So you'd put down stats for everyone else EXCEPT yourself. It sucks when you find out that you're not as smart/handsome/charming/intelligent as you thought you were, but on the flipside it's the most unbiased.
Now sometimes mistakes were made and people could advocate. For example, my friends put down my strength as being a lot lower then I thought it should be (I'm a pretty small guy) so I demonstrated that I should have greater strength by lifting up a guy 150lbs heavier then me. That bumped me up a couple points
Anyway, for intelligence we would just round your IQ to the nearest and drop a decimal place, so on that system, a 20 Intelligence would equate to about 200 IQ, i.e. completely off the scale.
Then again LCS is completely OTT because Juice increases every stat
.
Anyway, I have no objections to anything in particular, it doesn't bother me. Just saying that self-stating is very difficult to do objectively. Even if you drop ego aside, it's very hard to rate yourself accurately. Peer review is the best way to be objective.