"Okay. I know zat. But zere eez zee leetle eessue zat zere eez nobody elze zat koult haff done eet."
"Do you have incontrovertible proof that the defendant actually committed the crime? Do you have incontrovertible proof that ABSOLUTELY NO-ONE ELSE could have committed the crime? Do you perhaps have evidence you're holding out on? Because that would constitute a mistrial. Do you, in fact, have any real proof besides a trail of water and a print-less knife? Do you, in fact, have any proof at all? Maybe, and this is just a wild theory, some other Trainer with a Water type could have done this because as far as I know, you have not provided any definitive evidence that the defendant was ever present at the scene of the crime. In fact, there is a rather suspicious witness back on page 84 that was the last person to see the victim alive, according to his testimony. Which is, well, suspect.
'Nobody else could have done it' is not proof that someone did do it."
(*starts reading the record*
"Also, are we perhaps forgetting someone? Did we ever return to this TRASHYMAN guy? He might have evidence.
Oh. Feraligatrs have teeth on BOTH sides of the jaw, and the puncture marks were only on the back. Not to mention, you know, the shape of the teeth. That would certainly lend credence to the whole 'it was not, in fact, a Pokémon that did this' because the wounds are only on one side.
...Hey! That witness had a Pokeball...Did we ever actually SEE the Pokémon in it?")
Author
Topic: Bay12 Courtroom: Thread Retired, New Thread Pending (Read 241940 times)