All right, little late. It seems that FD wasn’t serious and PoH and SG explained the problem with being “happy” with non-existence—specifically, if you don’t exist, who is being happy?—though I suppose, if I were in better spirits, I could have imagined Frumple meant that he would be happy to
discover that he would, at some future point, cease to exist.
I don’t know how serious you are all being, so I can give you the benefit of the doubt, but this is facepalm worthy if you are serious.
Oh, you think I am not serious? 
Ye of little faith.
Reincarnation was defined as passing on ones genetic traits (described as 'inbuilt nature') onto a new life form. How is that not pretty simple genetics? Please, enlighten me, where did I go wrong?
Rolling your own
Personal Dictionary is a completely useless activity unless you mean to pull some lingual shenanigans.
Good news for people who like reincarnation, turns out it is true.
When people wonder if reincarnation is true, do you really think that they are asking “Are traits passed from parent to offspring?” We’ve known that since
before anyone even knew what a gene was. You’ve taken “reincarnation
Max White” and feigned it was “reincarnation”.
This is a more extreme example of your
heinous crime mistake. To be fair, your discussion was more muddled, and you might have had a little help from Devling.
I define “God” to mean toasters.
Toasters are a thing you know.
Good news to people who like God, turns out he’s real.
Redefine a word, prove that its new referent is true, valid, or in existence, then go right back to using the original definition like you were using it all along—
not necessarily on purpose, either.
Author
Topic: Amazingly Stupid Things You've Heard People Say (Read 1004367 times)