Note that the group of refugees about to be deported are mostly babies and children born in Australia (and their immigrant parents). The court ruled that it's okay to deport babies and children, against a child's mother who filed a lawsuit.
No, they are not mostly babies or children. There are 54. Letting them stay because good feels completely ignores that letting them stay encourages more human traffickers to send people across the Indian Ocean to Australia where most will perish, it is the retardation of Germany to repeat the mistake that resulted in tens of thousands dying in the Meditteranean and millions overcoming Europe to do the same in Australia. They give them medical treatment needed and send them back. Australia has to deal with a few dozens, Germany cannot deal with its millions - when at first Germany need only deal with tens of thousands, and before that thousands. In just
two years Australia ended human trafficking from the Middle East and Southern Asia, sending hundreds on a perilous journey by boat to the promised land, by simply promising all who arrive will be sent home. No one is willing anymore to pay thousands to traffickers for a place they know will return them. The asylum seekers they have now are ones that arrived before they enacted this policy.
Human rights? Pffft. Lol UN, come at me bro.
Every single one of those boats passes through Malaysia, Singapore and Indonesia. They are not even allowed to dock on the islands of those three countries, and if they are caught the human traffickers amongst them are executed and everyone on board deported. Yet Australia shows them this compassion, and are attacked for not showing more by giving them permanent residency.
The people who attack them will never be placated, they only attack Western countries.
The Anglican "problematic" reverend amongst the 10 Churches offering a self-proclaimed sanctuary for 30 people who can be removed with no consequence. The Anglican Church is currently mired in 5th columnists who unironically call for the de-Christianization of the Anglosphere, just as the Irish Catholic Church tried convincing the Irish that they weren't dismantling their beliefs.
This just in: Australia's High Court has cleared deportation of asylum seekers from the mainland to offshore detention centers. In response, nearly a dozen Anglican churches have offered sanctuary to those at risk of deportation, in hopes the PR disaster of police officers storming holy ground to drag people out will discourage officials from acting.
Trying to play PR with a media that has already taken its side is pointless, least of all on unholy ground. Those that play on puppet strings will find they will only ever become just that - a puppet. I also do not see who loses face in a successful bipartisan policy, as cowering to appease problematic progressives with no power could be no greater humiliation to all of Australia.
BBC is now apparently making Cold War-esque anti-Russian films again, this time about how Putin shall attack Latvia for reasons unknown and nuke British troops in process.
The Russian official review was really predictable, though. The full film can be found on Russian streaming sites like Rutube.
"Strategic funding" to counter Sputnik news and Russian shillery.
The Kremlin's international media operation appears to be going from strength to strength with two recent high-profile launches and more in the pipeline.
But it is also coming under increased scrutiny over its lack of editorial balance and accusations that it is deliberately using disinformation to counter and divide the West.
At any rate I should hope people do not base their worldviews upon media, but unfortunately that is definitively wrong.
Author
Topic: Non-EU europe thread (with Russia, Israel and Australia included) (Read 198530 times)