This game has too many lurkers: any one of them could have initiated the kill that struck down our faithful companion TDS. That means you, Scientist, SBC, Tiruin.
I have no comment for this, and will not defend myself--only against the label of being a lurker. 'Stuff' happened in my life as of recent note hence my lacking online activity (ie 2 day absence despite yesterday being my free day) and..I am unsure whether to bring it into full view. RL stuffs, is all I can say.
DAY 1 STUFF
4maskTiruin: You are the ugly, and are suspected as a confederate. How do you diffuse suspicion?
I'll take it this is a D2 thing, yes?
I will diffuse it at best by not going against the speaker, directly, as it can either be an inspector, or a liar. In the note of a '7 are Union soldiers, 3 are Confederate Saboteurs, and 3 are third parties.' the belief behind such a suspicion is more solid than anything else, especially by a claimed inspect (however you didn't type this out).
However, I say it will be most subjective, both the situation and my response--I usually lay out details, and counterpoint, as a general rule. I never go directly against a statement unless I identify something seriously awry with it.
Mr. CheeseTiruin: You're the Bad, and the Good is dead. Someone claims Union General, and says that another person is a Confederate, but they don't get lynched by making the argument that they are the Ugly. Instead, the person claiming Union General gets lynched, and is proven to have told the truth. What do you do, and why?
I flail in joy like a muppet.Opportunistic semblance to personal reaction aside, I am a Union SK. I do as I said above, but to myself IRL and not in thread-post. I will..well, depending on the situation I either delve into it and check on what the rest are doing, leave those claimants to stew among their fates and act as a bystander-prosecutor or base my proceedings on what had just happened.
I...do not work well with general statements (pun not intended), but require a specific situation.
Query: Why pull a neutral role in sucha situation? What were you thinking about me when you asked me this?
NQTTiruin — What's a good reason to lynch somebody today?
Information and their strings attached. I do have a better detailed answer however.
I wonder why you ask me this? What is your opinion and what is your reason for a lynch?
In this note: I'm a Mafia Philosopher. :I I said in regard to what you said in your 'preamble' here is a bad thing due to the translation of qualitative to quantitative and back. It is in the discernment of how you use that method and NOT the method itself that I disliked. Remember the first time you pulled that vote pattern? When you were Mafia-I didn't like how you used it then (back in a game when...Masons and Mafias? I think?)
As for your question: do you mean my little introductory speech? It wasn't that subtle: I outright stated I was a unionist. I enjoy a little bit of light roleplaying to set the mood; I listen to my Spaghetti Western playlist too.
Hmm, reasonable. Well, to me, it seems like subtle insinuation of your intent or role-designed as a subconscious effect. I can also pull my best Union story but what I got as a role PM, being me...is horribly short. Grr @Persus. :I
Anyway, why did you outright state that?
ScientistTrirruin- how much do you hate it when I misspell your name?[/b]
Hate is such an irrelevant word, sir. I do not hate, I am irritate.
Fancy wording aside, I hold no malice towards those who get my [details] wrong, since I can usually always sense if mistake or intentional. Here? You're being silly. So rawr. :I
Why post an irrelevant question to me? Or do designedly deign to discern my disposition towards your dubious dictation?
Mehve/MOWETiruin:
You've been active on the forum, but not here. Any particular reason why?
Mostly personal organization. What hit me from not posting here (as well as more prioritized threads like my own BM and other stuffs) was my emotional state. It was...not good. However I will state in all honesty and be open to all scrutiny when I say that I was not intentionally staying away from this thread (I mean, wow. A whole mafia day. x__x Goodness.)
...So no particular reason why, which is directly related to Mafia.
Mr. CheeseTiruin: You need to stop delaying, Borscht or not. What are your reads so far? And if you would explain the reasons for your reads?
I fail to make a miswording of something funny. As for reads-they were all neutral at the time of my last post with subtle curiosity regarding IG on the skim, NQT for his 'self-claim' as an introductory post, Interest at Solymyr for being new and able to explain himself thoroughly--all neutral reads, but all curious.
Meaning: No I have no read, and I do apologize for my effort. I shouldn't have been weak. I should've posted here. I am sorry.
Reason @above: Skimming, yet I also connected the cause to effect, though my reads are more influenced if I put my weight behind them (or if what I observe their actions are, have good 'emphasis' into them).
And for this delaying note, I do see that you put that as a subtle-aggressive-prod, yes? I was not delaying, however.
I have finished my read and curiosity grows when encountering posts around the 150th mark. Too vague to mark down, but I wll return soonish.
4mask2. Tiruin, while not posting anything particularly towny-esque, hasn't posted anything that I would consider a scumtell either. If there is something I missed with a cursory examination, could you link to it?
...I made
one post. Really? You can find wrong when there is only one point to base it on?
Author
Topic: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (Game Over!) (Read 87894 times)